CATAPULT YOUR CAREER:

Get my best tips for a good academic life, directly to your inbox. Free. Read by hundreds. 1-click unsubscribe.

Chasing Shiny Topics Kills the Work That Lasts

Chasing Shiny Topics Kills the Work That Lasts

1. Refined Thought

Shiny object syndrome is destroying everything nice in academia. You jump between topics and venues, and you refuse to do the boring, repetitive work that actually pays off in the long run.

2. Related Quote

“Enthusiasm is common. Endurance is rare.”

Angela Duckworth

3. Why This Matters to You

Every new topic puts you back at the start. You read a new literature, face reviewers who do not know you, and try to earn trust from a community that has never seen your name. Tenure committees and funders look for a clear line through your record, and scattered papers make that line hard to see. Your doctoral students pay too, because their theses need a supervisor who is still in the field three years later. The dull work of follow-up studies, careful replications and showing up at the same venue year after year is what builds a reputation people cite.

4. Counter Viewpoint

Some of the best research happens when someone carries a method from one field into another. Funding also moves with trends, and a researcher who never shifts can end up with a strong record and no money to continue. Repetition can turn into a rut, where you keep publishing the same paper with small changes. So the hard question is how you tell curiosity from avoidance when you feel the pull toward something new.

About the author 

Simo Hosio  -  Simo is an award-winning scientist, Academy Research Fellow, research group leader, professor, and builder.